Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
From The Durable Love Guides — a nine-Guide series for couples, written by Jerry Wheeler, LMHC, NCC. The Guides take up specific predicaments couples recognize themselves in and draw a single clinical distinction with precision. They are not techniques. They are accurate descriptions of what is actually happening — written in the register of someone who does this work for a living and has no interest in softening it.
Someone apologized to you. The apology had the form. It named the thing. You accepted it. And still, something did not close.
You may have wondered whether the apology was insincere. It probably was not. What this Guide names is the more common possibility — that the apology was entirely sincere and entirely insufficient, because sincerity and adequacy are different things. Most apologies couples offer each other are competent social performances calibrated to the event. Some wounds require something structurally different — a kind of repair that enters the injury rather than closing the incident.
This Guide distinguishes transactional repair from restorative repair, describes what each requires from both partners, and names a specific failure mode most material on this territory leaves out: the difference between accepting an apology genuinely and accepting it as a form of compliance to end the conflict.
The Guide is written for both partners — the one whose apology has not landed, and the one whose apology-reception has not been what either of them thought it was.
This is Guide 4 of 9 in The Durable Love Guides series. Each Guide stands alone. Together they describe what durable love is built from.
From The Durable Love Guides — a nine-Guide series for couples, written by Jerry Wheeler, LMHC, NCC. The Guides take up specific predicaments couples recognize themselves in and draw a single clinical distinction with precision. They are not techniques. They are accurate descriptions of what is actually happening — written in the register of someone who does this work for a living and has no interest in softening it.
Someone apologized to you. The apology had the form. It named the thing. You accepted it. And still, something did not close.
You may have wondered whether the apology was insincere. It probably was not. What this Guide names is the more common possibility — that the apology was entirely sincere and entirely insufficient, because sincerity and adequacy are different things. Most apologies couples offer each other are competent social performances calibrated to the event. Some wounds require something structurally different — a kind of repair that enters the injury rather than closing the incident.
This Guide distinguishes transactional repair from restorative repair, describes what each requires from both partners, and names a specific failure mode most material on this territory leaves out: the difference between accepting an apology genuinely and accepting it as a form of compliance to end the conflict.
The Guide is written for both partners — the one whose apology has not landed, and the one whose apology-reception has not been what either of them thought it was.
This is Guide 4 of 9 in The Durable Love Guides series. Each Guide stands alone. Together they describe what durable love is built from.